<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You know you&#8217;re gonna live through the rain . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dangerousdirtyunfun.com/2009/09/you-know-youre-gonna-live-through-the-rain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dangerousdirtyunfun.com/2009/09/you-know-youre-gonna-live-through-the-rain/</link>
	<description>"Although the odds against it are staggering, it MIGHT turn out to be sublime."</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Johanna</title>
		<link>http://dangerousdirtyunfun.com/2009/09/you-know-youre-gonna-live-through-the-rain/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 04:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerousdirtyunfun.com/?p=211#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Hey there. Forgive my possibly-less-than-lucid comment. It's late!

So, I read IJ (as you know), and I effing LOVED it (as you know). Like, I'd pull up stakes and move for this book, because I so thoroughly enjoyed its company. 

Dear, sweet, earnest IJ has taken a lot of flack from the blogs w/r/t the ending (dare I say more and spoil it for other readers?). All I have to say was that the end didn't ruin anything for me. Ok, that's not all I have to say, because I am still typing. The ending was fine. The joy of reading IJ, as far as I am concerned, is procedural. It's a pleasure to be drawn into DFW's universe. It's not a hospitable place, but it's fascinating, and I didn't want it to go away. So the lack-of-ending-ending actually sort of comforted me, in a way, because I can continue thinking in terms of that universe on my own terms, without any clear deliniations of "THE END."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there. Forgive my possibly-less-than-lucid comment. It&#8217;s late!</p>
<p>So, I read IJ (as you know), and I effing LOVED it (as you know). Like, I&#8217;d pull up stakes and move for this book, because I so thoroughly enjoyed its company. </p>
<p>Dear, sweet, earnest IJ has taken a lot of flack from the blogs w/r/t the ending (dare I say more and spoil it for other readers?). All I have to say was that the end didn&#8217;t ruin anything for me. Ok, that&#8217;s not all I have to say, because I am still typing. The ending was fine. The joy of reading IJ, as far as I am concerned, is procedural. It&#8217;s a pleasure to be drawn into DFW&#8217;s universe. It&#8217;s not a hospitable place, but it&#8217;s fascinating, and I didn&#8217;t want it to go away. So the lack-of-ending-ending actually sort of comforted me, in a way, because I can continue thinking in terms of that universe on my own terms, without any clear deliniations of &#8220;THE END.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

